
Jane d of George Payne/DONNE
Old disputes brought to light online by Roger Donne
Old disputes
brought to
light online
by ROGER DONNE (15290)
I
EXPECT that many CFHS members
are aware of the wealth of catalogued resources available online through the Access to Archives (A2A) website as well as the individual catalogues provided by the various local record offices in Eng-land and Wales - the Cornwall Record Office provides a good example of these on-line records.
For several years I have been search-ing these sites for references to DONNE family connections in Camborne, St Erth and surrounding parishes, believing that I can trace a family line back to Pascow DONNE of Camborne and St Erth in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, through the numerous variants of this common family name.
I had thought that I had come to the end of the catalogued documents but was surprised and delighted to discover two further references to Pascow DONNE that now appear in the catalogue of The National Archives,
Each document related to proceedings in the Court of Chancery, which dealt mainly with disputes regarding land. I enquired as to the cost of copies, which I found compared well with the cost of travelling to TNA at Kew, I therefore ordered the copies, which arrived several weeks later securely rolled up in a card-board tube, and which enabled me to start on the task of transcription.
As usual, on first sight, the script ap-peared intractable and the documents too damaged and faded to enable me to tran-scribe the text, but with help of a magnifying glass it was possible to deduce the gist of each document.
I discovered each was in fact the state- ment of the plaintiff (or 'orator' as referred to in the documents) to the Lord Chancellor, so that they don't record the response of the defendant nor do we know the final judgment of the Court. Perhaps there are uncatalogued references still waiting to be discovered that record the outcome of the proceedings.
For those interested in DONNE fam-ily history and a picture of litigation in seventeenth century West Penwith, I have provided a description and commentary on each document. I have highlighted the fam-ily names that occur, using the spellings as they appear in the source document.
The earliest document (TNA Cata-logue Reference C3/276/67) refers to a case brought by James HOCKEN against Paskowe DONNE concerning a tenement called Pengegon; both HOCKEN and DONNE are described as yeomen of the parish of Camborne, There is no date that I could find on the document. but it does address the Lord Chancellor, Sir Thomas EGERTON. Apparently, he was in office as Lord Keeper and later Lord Chancellor from 1596 to 1617, spanning the reigns of Elizabeth I and James I.
A reference to ‘his magisties Honor-able Coort of Chancerye’ leads to a date after the accession of James I on 24 Mar 1603, although other references (see, for example, www.luminarium.org/encyclo-pedia/egerton.htm) state that Sir Thomas was created Baron Ellesmere by James I on 19 July 1603.
It seems that the document could date to those few months between March and July 1603 when he was still plain Sir Tho-as but certainly it must predate Paskowe DONNE’s move from Camborne to St Erth. I believe this move happened circa 1612 according to other family informa-tion I have put together (see my letter to the CFHS Journal, January 2008)
THE document represents the submis-
sion by the plaintiff, James HOCK-
EN to the Lord Chancellor that Paskowe DONNE had claimed a false title to the tenement of Pengegon in Camborne to which James HOCKEN and Bleanche his wife were the lawful tenants under a lease from James BASSETT, lord of the manor of ‘Tehydye’.
James HOCKEN recites the terms and obligations of the lease, but unfor-tunately he cannot produce the original indenture even after diligent search — ‘in bagge, boxe or chest, sealed, locked or unlocked’,
The document also relates how Paskowe DONNE brought proceed-ings against Henrye EDYE, a labourer and a ‘retayner’ of James HOCKEN, in the Hundred Court of Penwith, and how James HOCKEN stood surety for EDYE and was arrested,imprisoned by the stew-ard of the Court, Bennett ANGOVE, and forced to pay an unreasonable fine to se-cure his release.
None of this reflects very well on Paskowe DONNE, but we don't know his side of the story or the eventual judg-
ment of the Court of Chancery, The area of Camborne known as Pengegon which was the cause of this dispute can still be found on modern maps of the town.
Subsequent to the proceedings in Chancery in which Paskowe DONNE of Camborne was sued by James HOCK-EN, Paskow himself, now described as “of the parish of St Erth, yeoman”, also brought proceedings against Francis BAS- SETT of the Manor of Tehidy set out in a document dated 1622, TNA Reterence C3/345/14. (Other information I have indicates that Pascow resided in St Erth, Where he leased the Barton of Trewinnard from about 1612 until his death in 1632).
In this case, the document addresses the Lord Chancellor as ' John, Lord Bish-op of Lyncolne’. (John WILLIAMS was Bishop of Lincoln from 1621 to 1641 and Lord Chancellor from 1621 to 1625; he was the last cleric to hold the office of Lord Chancellor.)
The document represents the sub- mission by the plaintiff, Paskow DUNN, to the Lord Chancellor that Fraunces BAS-ETT had refused to honour an agree-ment made between Paskow DUNN and James BASSETT, now deceased, the fa- ther of Fraunces BASSETT concerning certain holdings in the Manor of Tehidy.
Paskhow DUNN says the holdings were originally let by James BASSETT to William KYMPE, John DYER and Jone his wife upon their three lives, and their interest was subsequently bought out by one Allexander ANGOVE in 1599 ("eighteneth Daye of Aprill in the one and flortyeth yeare of the Raigne of our late soveraizne Ladye Queine Elhzabeth")
I can't read clearly the regnal year of the original lease but it looks like 26 Oct, 30 Elizabeth 1 (1588). Later Allex-ander ANGOVE sold this interest on to Paskow DUNN who also paid a tee to James BASSETT on the understanding that he could nominate other lives to the lease and hence extend his tenure.
Of the original lives, all but Jone DYER had died at the time of these pro-ceedings, 1622. When James BASSETT died, Paskow says that he approached Fraunces BASSETT who said that he would accept the testimony of Allexander ANGOVE in the Manor Court of Tehidy as sufficient proof of the agreement with his father James BASSETT. Paskow DUNN says that Allexander ANGOVE did duly appear before the Court and tes-tified on oath before William CARNAN gent., steward of the Manor of Tehidy.
However, Paskow DUNN claims that although he had done all that was re-quired of him by Fraunces BASSETT. he, Fraunces, still refused to acknowledge his right to name fresh lives and contin-ued to harass him and his tenants within the holdings, “thereby intendinge and purposinge to oppresse your sayd Orra-tor and to wrest the sayd premises wholye from your Orrator"
I am not sure exactly where the hold-ings in question were. though I can rec-ognise references to the hamlet of Rose Warne, and Dondrea Downs (I've not found anything like this latter place on modern maps of Camborne and its sur-roundings).
BY this time. 1622, Paskow DUNN had relocated from Camborne to St
Erth, leasing the barton of Trewinnard as well as other tenements in that parish - with his burial likely to have taken place there on 2 Nov 1630 and subsequently his will being proved 11 Jan 1630/31.
As before, we only have the statement of the plaintiff, so do not know how Fran-cis BASSETT would have answered the charges. However, with so much litiga-tion with the lord of the manor and fellow yeomen in Camborne, it would seem that a move to St Erth would have been very wise for Paskow.
I would be delighted if any reader could assist me in my interpretation of the documents or shed any further light on the places, persons and families mentioned,
CONTACT: roger@donne.free-online.co.uk

